convexent

Unleash your financial judgment.

Build and analyze the model your business runs on.

Question your model in plain English and get an answer back in seconds, fully cited.

For example: Summarize how revenue is built up and which drivers move it most. Where does EBITDA land this year if the pipeline holds? Compare all scenarios side-by-side. What drives the differences? Reverse-solve: what would have to change to break even a quarter earlier?

An accounting agent for your finance team

It takes on the repetitive half of the close. Bank, card, payroll and billing come in, and every entry arrives proposed with its reasoning attached. Your accountants review it and post it to the accounting system you already use, so the books close faster and their hours go to the judgment calls.

A built-in intelligence layer

Run your sensitivities and scenarios against the live actuals, and ask the model anything in plain English.

Defensible all the way down

Every figure traces to the page it came from, and to the formulas that depend on it. Download it and the workbook is real, working Excel, so your board, your lender and your auditor follow the arithmetic themselves.

Collaboration enabled

Unlock anyone on the team to ask questions and get cited answers in seconds, so your business moves forward even if the one who built your model is on a plane.

Integrate directly into the heart of your business for next-level intelligence.

Integrates with Brex, Stripe, Deel, Gusto, QuickBooks Online, Slack, NetSuite, Mercury, Ramp, Rippling, Carta.

Validation on every build

Nothing reaches your board unchecked.

Every build runs hundreds of deterministic checks against the model: balance sheet integrity, cash flow mechanics, sign conventions, assumptions that have quietly gone dead. Each one either passes or fails, so trust rests on something you can point at. A broken relationship surfaces while it is still cheap to fix, well before the meeting.

See how the validators work

Checking now

Validator categories include Balance sheet balance, Cash flow mechanics, Revenue reconciliation, Sign conventions, Circular dependencies, Asset rollforward, Depreciation rates, Scenario differentiation, Assumption reasonableness, Natural units, Dead assumptions, Degenerate growth rates, Churn methodology, Source provenance.

Each check gives the model a clear failure to fix, rather than asking your team to find it by eye.

Acme Events Management Actuals through Q4 '25

Inputs

  • New Cust Adds varies by time, scenario
  • Avg MRR per Cust 3,300
  • Qtrly Churn Rate varies by scenario
  • Hosting % Rev 0.15
$ thousands Q4 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26Q3 '26
New MRR 105.0 125.4 102.3 132.0
ARR 12,099.5 13,114.3 13,810.7 14,835.4
Revenue 3,034.2 3,278.6 3,452.7 3,708.9
Gross Profit 2,579.1 2,786.8 2,934.8 3,152.5
EBITDA (7.9) (132.9) (13.7) 3.6
EBITDA Margin % (0.26%) (4.05%) (0.40%) 0.10%

Avg MRR per Cust 3,000 → 3,300 18 forecast cells recalculated actuals unchanged

The whole model, built on your numbers

Drivers, headcount, churn, scenarios and all three statements, stood up from your own historicals and shaped by how your business actually works. Change one assumption and see the impact immediately.

What are my paths to EBITDA break-even, and what would each one require?

Answered from the model

The business is currently projected to finish 2028-Q4 with a quarterly EBITDA loss of −$154,4241. Existing pipeline revenue drops off from 2027-Q3, and new project wins have to fill the gap.

  1. 1

    The Pricing Path Labor bill rate

    Raise labor_bill_rate from $180/hr to $194/hr (+7.8%)2. This alone bridges the $154k gap.

  2. 2

    The Scale Path T&M volume

    A sustained 18 new T&M projects per quarter, starting earlier in the forecast, reaches positive EBITDA of $29,233 by the final period4.

  3. 3

    The Cost Efficiency Path G&A reduction

    If pricing is constrained by the market, break-even can come from overhead reduction, closing the $154k quarterly gap through G&A.

Your analyst, always on

AI Analysis provides practical, data-grounded responses that help you make the best decisions for your company.

Proposed entries · June 2026

Transaction Proposed treatment Confidence Waiting on you
Fairview Supply Co · $18,450 brex · card 8842 · receipt attached Site supplies 6200 / 1000 operating cash high review & post to NetSuite
June payroll · $412,300 deel · 41 workers Site labor, split across 26 sites 6100 / 2010 accrued payroll high review & post to NetSuite
Occupancy accrual · $96,200 recurring obligations Occupancy 6300 / 2015 accrued expenses high review & post to NetSuite
Ridgeway Contracting · $7,900 brex · card 8871 · Oak Ridge Repairs, or capitalize to the new site? Oak Ridge opened 11 days before this invoice asks you one question in Slack
  • your general ledger stays the system of record
  • you post; the agent never does
  • closed actuals feed the operating model

An agent beside your ERP

Your general ledger stays where it is, and so does the posting. The agent does the repetitive part of the close around it: pulling sources, drafting each entry with the reasoning attached, allocating payroll, reconciling cash, and handing you proposals to review. You post. Because it also knows the drivers behind your numbers, what it proposes reflects how the business actually works.

The same model open in Excel, with a real formula visible in the formula bar

Excel underneath it all

Your work stays in the model, where every number is live. Underneath it the arithmetic is genuine Excel formulas, so the moment your board, your lender or your auditor wants to check it, hand them the workbook and they follow the same math in a file they already know.

See it on your own numbers

Bring a P&L export and a pipeline sheet. In 10 minutes you will see the model underneath your own business: where the year lands, and the workbook you can hand to your board.

Want to see the checks behind it? Read how we validate a financial model, including the reference workbook, its inputs, and the hundreds of checks that run on every build.